d pitch = zp/π; L pitch = N belt p; teeth in mesh = z small θ small/(2π)
Circular pulley pitch convention for selected matching profile. Engagement is fractional geometric contact; entered required engagement is a separate user criterion.
VALICALC / MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SUITE / DS08
Enter pulley teeth and a matching pitch convention. Compare theoretical belt teeth with your physical selection and recalculate the complete pitch-line geometry and engagement.
Verified mathematical models with explicit assumptions. Component capacity and applicability are shown as separate checks.
Labeled example inputs • SI calculations • Project revision 0 • No account or cloud upload
01 / ENGINEERING INPUTS
Actual available belt; nearest theoretical integer is not necessarily a catalog size.
Use the selected manufacturer's rating/engagement method.
02 / CALCULATE → SELECT → RECALCULATE
Actual center distance
199.36439 mmActual pitch/datum length
550 mmTheoretical length at preliminary center
551.26718 mmCenter adjustment
-0.63561 mmActual reduction ratio
2Driven RPM
750 rpmBelt speed
2.5 m/sSmall-pulley wrap
170.84228 degEffective pull · total
200 NTight tension · per belt/rib
300 NSlack tension · per belt/rib
100 NEstimated span load on each shaft
399.0429 NTheoretical belt teeth
110.25344Selected belt teeth
110Driver pitch diameter
31.83099 mmDriven pitch diameter
63.66198 mmSmall-pulley teeth in mesh · geometric
9.49124| State | Center (m) | Exact length (m) | Legacy approximate length (m) | Small wrap (rad) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preliminary | 0.2 | 0.551267 | 0.551267 | 2.982269 |
| Actual / recalculated | 0.199364 | 0.55 | 0.549999 | 2.98176 |
Positive, non-overlapping pitch/datum circles. Outside diameters, take-up and installation clearances remain unverified.
Exact pitch-line residual 1.11e-16 m.
No current applicable product rating dataset. Operating load calculations do not establish allowable capacity.
Required engagement is unspecified; consult product guidance.
Actual dimensions control all downstream results. Ratio uses integer pulley teeth / circular pitch.
Exact tangent geometry solves length and center; the established approximate ValiCalc kernel is retained in the comparison table.
P/v gives total effective pull. 1 equal load-sharing belt/rib path(s); operating slack tension is entered rather than inferred from installation pretension.
Matching profile htd5; pitch 0.005 m. Selected 110 teeth gives 0.55 m pitch length.
Span-force vector estimate excludes weight and transient loads. No overall safety/capacity approval.
Open two-pulley drive with no idler. Enter consistent actual datum/pitch diameters and lengths. Outside diameters, alignment and take-up travel still need checking.
Tensions are operating values; equal sharing across entered belts/ribs is an assumption. Shaft span-force estimate excludes pulley weight, bearing reactions and transient loading.
Capacity, fatigue, installation pretension and allowable speed require current product-specific evidence. No catalog dimensions or ratings are inferred.
HTD 3M/5M pitch conventions are supported by SDP/SI product documentation; catalog belt availability, tooth shape, width, torque capacity and tooth-jump resistance are not validated.
Teeth in mesh is fractional geometric contact, not a count of fully load-bearing teeth. Required engagement is user supplied. No automatic tooth-width or allowable load selection.
20/40 teeth at 5 mm pitch gives pitch diameters 31.831/63.662 mm and 2:1 reduction. Selecting a 110-tooth belt fixes pitch length at 550 mm; the physical center and engagement are solved again.
Circular pulley pitch convention for selected matching profile. Engagement is fractional geometric contact; entered required engagement is a separate user criterion.
Exact ideal tangent pitch-line geometry. A bounded bisection solves selected pitch length → physical center distance. No tooth deformation or installation tension correction.
α = asin(|D−d|/(2C)). Steady span-force estimate using entered slack tension or operating tension ratio. Equal belt/rib sharing is an explicit assumption; no rated belt count is inferred.
Gates Heavy Duty V-Belt Drive Design Manual, tension ratio D18; independent vector sum
Textbook references identify the method context. Historical numerical catalog, material and service-factor tables have not been copied or treated as current product ratings.
Existing component-selection Jobs → · All mechanical worksheets →
No. The worksheet separates mathematical results from criterion-specific checks. Actual motor, belt, sprocket and chain capacity need applicable current manufacturer data and installation review.
The worksheet recalculates the outputs and geometry from the entered actual dimensions or discrete tooth/link count. Dependent checks are reevaluated; previously saved results are not restored as approvals.