Freight & Logistics

Container Loading Calculator

Estimate a loose-carton container load from a mixed-SKU packing list. Choose permitted carton orientations and stacking, then inspect loaded and leftover counts, cargo cube, payload use and a three-dimensional placement preview.

Change any input to update the calculation. Unit changes preserve the physical quantity.

CALCULATION SETUP

Inputs

Cargo only, excluding container tare; enter the actual equipment/carrier limit.

Subtract twice this value from length/width and once from roof height.

Loose carton packing list · up to 2,000 pieces per calculation

Carton row 1

External package including contents and packaging, per carton.

Floor rotation keeps the carton upright. All axes permits tipping onto another face.

Yes requires a verified compression and stacking capacity; the geometry engine cannot establish it.

1 / 100 rows · each row keeps its own units

Calculated locally in your browser. No sign-up or input upload.

YOUR CALCULATION

Results

Cartons loaded

10

Cartons left over

0

Cartons requested

10

Loaded external carton volume

0.96 m³33.902 ft³

Loaded gross cargo weight

120 kg264.555 lb

Usable cube utilization

2.935 %

Cargo payload utilization

0.427 %
5.88 × 2.332 × 2.385 m usable space
3D placement preview · 10 loaded cartons. Colors identify SKUs. Every upper carton has full footprint support; loading access and restraint still need review.

Calculation breakdown

Carton A
10 loaded / 10 requested · 0 left over
Placement method
Supported guillotine placement · best of input, volume and footprint orders

Assumptions & checks

This is a geometric planning estimate. It does not validate compression strength, stacking capacity, restraints, load stability, axle loads or structural ratings.

The plan checks geometric placement and a per-carton door aperture, but does not simulate handling equipment, an accessible loading sequence or unloading. Mixed-span support and packing across combined support cartons are intentionally not assumed.

Supports 100 SKUs and 2,000 total cartons per run to keep browser work bounded. Equipment dimensions are editable carrier examples, not universal container standards.

Formula

A deterministic 3D guillotine heuristic tries input, descending-volume and descending-footprint orders, retaining the best loaded count then cube. Each upper carton has full footprint support from a single permitted supporting carton. A result is a feasible tested arrangement, not a proven optimum.

Place allowed orientations in disjoint free boxes; reject orientations exceeding the door aperture; split remaining space into right, back and fully supported upper regions; stop before payload or piece limits; report requested − loaded as leftovers

Worked example

Using the default values shown in the calculator, the same formula gives the following result. This is a quick sanity check for the calculation, not a design recommendation.

Inputs

Container inside length
5.9 m
Container inside width
2.352 m
Container inside height
2.395 m
Door aperture width
2.34 m
Door aperture height
2.292 m
Permitted cargo payload
28130 kg
Clearance at each wall and roof
0.01 m
Row 1 · SKU / name
Carton A
Row 1 · Dimension unit
cm
Row 1 · Carton length
60 cm
Row 1 · Carton width
40 cm
Row 1 · Carton height
40 cm
Row 1 · Quantity
10
Row 1 · Gross weight per carton
12 kg
Row 1 · Allowed carton orientations
floor
Row 1 · Allow cartons on top of this carton
yes

Result

Cartons loaded
10
Cartons left over
0
Cartons requested
10
Loaded external carton volume
0.96 m³
Loaded gross cargo weight
120 kg
Usable cube utilization
2.935 %
Cargo payload utilization
0.427 %

Related calculators

Continue your workflow with a related calculation.

View all Freight & Logistics calculators

Frequently asked questions

Does this just divide container cube by carton cube?

No. Cartons receive explicit coordinates and permitted orientations in disjoint three-dimensional spaces. Door and payload limits apply before placement, and leftover counts are retained by SKU.

Is the result mathematically optimal?

No. It is the best of three bounded guillotine orderings. Tight gaps, combined support surfaces and other loading patterns can produce better real-world arrangements.

Does a rendered plan prove load stability?

No. Full footprint support is a geometric condition only. Compression ratings, restraints, center of gravity, access and safe handling require a separate loading assessment.

Reference data & method sources