δ1 = atan2(sinΣ, z2/z1+cosΣ); δ2=Σ−δ1; R=d1/(2sinδ1); dm=douter(R−b/2)/R
Conventional intersecting, acute pitch cones; outside transverse module and halfway mean-face station. Spiral output is nominal cone geometry, not generated tooth surfaces.
VALICALC / MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SUITE / DS12
Choose actual integer teeth, outer transverse module and intersecting shaft angle. Pitch cone and mean-face geometry form a common preliminary basis; straight-bevel forces are calculated separately. Spiral manufacturing, force signs and strength require the actual process and hand data.
Verified mathematical models with explicit assumptions. Component capacity and applicability are shown as separate checks.
Labeled example inputs • SI calculations • Project revision 0 • No account or cloud upload
01 / ENGINEERING INPUTS
02 / CALCULATE → SELECT → RECALCULATE
Pinion pitch cone angle
26.56505 degGear pitch cone angle
63.43495 degOuter cone distance
67.08204 mmMean cone distance
57.08204 mmOuter pinion pitch diameter
60 mmOuter gear pitch diameter
120 mmMean pinion pitch diameter
51.05573 mmMean gear pitch diameter
102.11146 mmMean transverse module
2.55279 mmOutput RPM
750 rpmOutput torque from entered efficiency
190 N·mInput mechanical power
15.70796 kWOutput mechanical power
14.92257 kWLoss from entered efficiency
0.7854 kWPinion nominal tangential force
3,917.28818 NPinion nominal radial force
1,275.25309 NPinion nominal axial force
637.62654 N| Member | Teeth | Cone angle (rad) | Outer pitch d (m) | Mean pitch d (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinion | 20 | 0.463648 | 0.06 | 0.051056 |
| Gear | 40 | 1.107149 | 0.12 | 0.102111 |
Cone angles sum to the entered shaft angle; both outer cone distances match by the selected tooth ratio.
No universal width limit is imposed; use actual applicable geometry/process guidance. No positive applicable limit was supplied.
Unshifted straight-bevel nominal force magnitudes at the pinion mean station; application signs require your coordinate convention.
Nominal pitch cones are not a generated Gleason/spiral manufacturing drawing.
Applicable ISO 10300/AGMA data, material and process factors need independent validation. Spur stress is not reused.
Efficiency is an entered motoring assumption; no material or product efficiency curve is supplied.
tanδ1 = sinΣ/(z2/z1 + cosΣ); δ2 = Σ − δ1, solved by atan2 with conventional acute cone limits.
R = d1/(2sinδ1); mean station Rm = R − b/2; dm = douter Rm/R. Actual face width changes geometry and nominal straight-bevel forces.
Straight pinion Fr = Ft tanα cosδ1; Fa = Ft tanα sinδ1. Nominal pinion forces derive from input torque, not loss-adjusted output torque.
Spiral mode keeps nominal pitch-cone/module calculations usable and explicitly blocks process-dependent force/rating procedures.
Conventional intersecting conical pitch surfaces require 0 < δ1,δ2 < 90°. No hypoid offset. Mean station is halfway along the entered face width; outside and mean module are distinct.
Finished tip/root and Gleason cutting geometry are not solved by these nominal pitch-cone calculations. Face-width applicability and cutting/mounting details must be reviewed.
Spiral mode exposes nominal pitch cones and mean module only. Cutter/process-specific generated tooth geometry, hand-dependent axial force, contact and ISO 10300/AGMA strength remain blocked.
20/40 teeth, outer module 3 mm and 90° shafts give cone angles 26.565° and 63.435° and outer cone distance 67.082 mm. A 20 mm face reduces the pinion mean diameter to 51.056 mm. 1500 RPM input gives 750 RPM output; entered 95% efficiency gives 190 N·m output torque.
Conventional intersecting, acute pitch cones; outside transverse module and halfway mean-face station. Spiral output is nominal cone geometry, not generated tooth surfaces.
Straight pinion nominal magnitudes; actual force signs require application axes. Spiral hand/process forces and strength are blocked.
KHK Gear Technical Reference, gear forces §12; independent pressure-angle force resolution.
Serial passive motoring power flow; 0 < η ≤ 1. Rotation signs do not imply a reversible loss model.
Tập 1, 2.15–2.18 and 3.23–3.25; independent conservation-of-energy derivation.
Textbook references identify the method context. Historical numerical catalog, material and service-factor tables have not been copied or treated as current product ratings.
Existing component-selection Jobs → · All mechanical worksheets →
No. The worksheet separates mathematical results from criterion-specific checks. Actual motor, belt, gear, shaft, bearing and joint capacity need applicable current source data and engineering review.
The worksheet recalculates the outputs and geometry from the entered actual dimensions or discrete tooth/link count. Dependent checks are reevaluated; previously saved results are not restored as approvals.